Sunday, December 16, 2012

Reflection


This is the final week in my graduate course called Integrating Technology Across the Content Areas.  What I have learned from this course is that it is important to teach students how to be self-directed learners by developing their own “GAME” plans by setting goals, planning action to meet those goals, and monitoring and evaluating their progress (Laureate, Inc., 2011).  Another important point I am taking away from this course is promoting creative and critical thinking in students with technology.  Dr. Katherine Cennamo explained that thinking critically is the key to economic competitiveness (Laureate, Inc., 2011). 

Following my own “GAME” plan through this course has made me realize the importance of giving students a timeline and checklist of when and how to get technological assignments done.  I have not been doing this before this class and anything I assign that needs technology ends up taking twice as long as I expect it too.   I have also been reflecting each week on if what I changed in my lessons promoted critical thinking and covers each of the main components for a good lesson. 

I might use the “GAME” plan process with my students like I have used it in this course.  I will give them a topic and they will have to come up with their own goals, actions, monitoring, and evaluation of their learning.  One way I plan to integrate technology and problem-based learning, online collaboration and digital storytelling into my teaching is by creating a project like the one I created for this class at the end of each unit I teach in biology.  There are six main units to cover in biology and having a project to culminate the unit will be an excellent way to tie everything together and assess student learning. 



References

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009). Integrating technology across the content areas. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Monitoring Your GAME Plan Progress


My goals for my GAME plan are to improve on all aspects of standard two, design and develop digital age learning experiences and assessments and standard three, model digital age learning of the National Education Standards for teachers.  This week I am monitoring and reflecting on if what I am doing is working for me and if I am learning what I need to (Laureate Education, Inc., 2009) in order to accomplish my GAME plan.  I am finding lots of information and resources to use in my classes for webquests and tutorials.  I even received many resources from my fellow colleagues at Walden University.  What I am lacking in is time to thoroughly evaluate each of these resources.  It is input overload at this point.  I held discussions with my students this past week and asked them if they thought they were learning from the computer webquests and tutorials that I have given them in the past.  What they shared with me was that they actually liked learning that way better than me lecturing while they take notes. 
I do not think I need to modify my action plan thus far.  Right now things seem to be on track for me to accomplish my goals.  I made an appointment with our schools technology advisor next week so he can teach me about using spreadsheets and a wiki in the classroom for the project-based technology-learning piece I want to add to a lesson where students will collaborate together. 
My fellow biology colleagues and I have not had a chance to go over the data from our 15-question assessment we gave to our students yet due to the short week this week.  So I don’t have the information about our best practices yet. 
The only new question that has arisen for me is am I going to have enough time to carry out this plan of mine by the end of this semester?  Finding time to meet with all of the people I need to meet with in order to carry out my plan has been a challenge because we all have different planning periods and schedules. 

Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009). Integrating    technology across the content areas. Baltimore, MD: Author.

National Education Standards for Teachers :  http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-t-standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2



Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Carrying Out my GAME Plan


Last week for my graduate class I reviewed the National Education Standards for Teachers.   I decided that I needed to improve on all aspects of standard two; design and develop digital age learning experiences and assessments.  Some of the learning experiences that I particularly wanted to improve on are my webquests and computer-based tutorials that I give my students.  In order to improve these I will need my course text and will need to spend time finding reliable resources on the Internet.  I also want to add a project-based technology-learning piece into my lessons where students would collaborate with a wiki.  I have only worked with a wiki one time for a graduate class I took. I will need to make an appointment with our technology specialist and have him help me create a wiki for the class.  It would be great to hear how Walden colleagues have used Wiki’s in their classes.  My fellow biology colleagues and I have created a 15-question assessment to be used with student response systems.   Each of us is going to give it to all of our classes.  The data will go directly into performance matters, which is our school districts digital tool for collecting data on students.  We are going to compare the data and determine what best practices are working with the student population at our school.    We will collaborate and discuss what each of us is doing that works and does not work and determine the best practices we should use during our PLC time in the week. 
I also need to improve on all aspects of standard three; model digital age work and learning.  An example of why I need to improve on this is the fact that I don’t have any experience with a wiki.  I also need to improve my knowledge in how to use spreadsheets in class.  In order to increase my knowledge in digital age work and learning I need to meet regularly with my technology specialist to keep up to date with new technologies.  I can also sign up for any classes offered through my school district.  I need to model “life-long learning” and continue to go to classes that will teach me new technologies. 


References:

Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2011). Nets for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.aspx




Saturday, November 10, 2012

Developing My Personal GAME Plan


This post is for a graduate course I am taking called Integrating Technology Across the Content Areas.  My content area is high school biology.  This week we examined the National Education Standards for Teachers and set goals to improve on at least two of the five indicators.  Quite honestly, I think I could improve on all five of the indicators.  I think I am better at standard one, which is facilitate and inspire student learning and creativity, standard four, which is promote and model digital citizenship and responsibility and standard five, which is engage in professional growth and leadership.  The two standards I really need to improve on the most are standard two, which is design and develop digital age learning experiences and assessments and standard three, which is model digital age work and learning.  After reading the resources this week, I realized that these two standards are the ones I really need to work on. 
Improving on these indicators is part of my GAME plan (Cennamo et. al., 2009, p. 3) for this course.  GAME represents setting goals, taking action, monitoring my progress, and evaluating my progress.  I have been incorporating computer-based tutorials and webquests into my lessons for the past couple of years.  I came to realize this week that I have been going about this incorrectly.    I learned that tutorials provide a complete lesson that includes presenting information, providing practice, and evaluating student learning (Cennamo et. al., 2009, p. 53).  I don’t think the tutorials I include in my lessons include all three of these parts.  I also learned that webquests include an introduction that motivates students, an outcome of the lesson, steps for the students, information on how the students will be evaluated and a reflection activity for students.  I came to realize that all of my webquests do not cover each of these components either.  Hence, I need to work on standard two and develop better digital age learning experiences and assessments.  There are still many technological resources I need to learn to use myself so I will feel confident in integrating technology effectively into my lessons (Laureate Education, Inc., 2009).  Hence, I need to work on standard three model digital age work and learning. 
In order to achieve these goals I need to revamp my lessons and make sure I am including all the correct parts to the technology pieces I include in my lessons.  I also need to really pay attention and make sure my students are learning from this technology integration.  I will also start asking my students’ opinion on if they think they are learning from these exercises.  Since I teach several honors classes and I have a good rapport with them I think they will give me an honest answer about their learning.  I will monitor my progress on these goals by reflecting each week on what I have changed and included in my lessons as far as technology goes for standard two and I will try to learn at least one new technology to incorporate each month for standard three.  I will evaluate and extend my learning by testing myself and incorporating what I learn into my lessons and teaching what I learn to other teachers during professional development days.  The science curriculum specialist in my county has been asking me to share what I learn during these days and it is a great way to extend what I am learning.  My main concern is for my students, I don’t want them to feel like they are “powering down” (Prensky, 2008, p. 42) when they walk into my classroom.  

Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom
     use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA:   
     Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009). Integrating    technology across the  
     content areas. Baltimore, MD: Author.

National Education Standards for Teachers :  http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-t-standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Prensky, M. (2008). Turning on the lights. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 40–45.



Sunday, June 17, 2012

Final Reflection


This is the final week of my graduate class called Bridging Learning Theory, Instruction, and Technology I am taking at Walden University.  During the first week of this course I was asked what my personal theory of learning is and this is what I said; I believe that students learn best when they are taught through which ever intelligence they learn best from and then use that information to work collaboratively on an inquiry-based, hands-on activity or project that they choose to do.  From what I have learned in this course my personal learning theory resembles the constructionist/constructivist and social learning theories.  Now that I know more about learning theories I would like to add components to my personal theory of learning that include behaviorist and cognitive learning theories.  I would include some sort of reinforcement of desirable behaviors for the behavioral component and I would include more images and less text and more opportunities for concept maps for the cognitive component.  This course has made me realize that there are many different theories of learning that need to me incorporated into all lessons to reach all of the diverse learners that there are in every class. 
An immediate adjustment that I will make to my instructional practice regarding technology is I will incorporate technology into every lesson.  Right now I do have some lessons I teach that do not require any technology.  Two technology tools that I will use with my students are concept mapping websites and voicethreads.  Both are very easy to use and they will enhance my students learning because they will have to think critically to make connections with the information they receive and they will have to work cooperatively with each other which are both skills they will need to be successful in the future.  I now have many technological “tools” in my “toolbox” that I can pull from to incorporate into all of my lessons.  I have come to realize that I need to let the students be more in control of their learning which will make them more accountable and I need to just be their to coach and guide their learning. 
One of the long-term goals I would like to make to my instructional practice is that I would like to be as possible to paperless in the classroom as I possibly can within the next few years.  This will be hard and it will depend on the availability of technology that my students have outside of school.  Another goal I have is to create an on-line course for students to take.  This would be a course such as honors environmental science that I could incorporate all of the technologies I have learned thus far in my graduate program of integrating technology into the classroom.  I will achieve these two goals by slowly replacing all parts of my lessons into technological activities.